For-profit and not-for-profit health funds operate under separate models, each of which has its own implications for policyholders just like you.
For-profit funds are – as the name suggests – driven by profits. This essentially means they are designed to generate revenue for their shareholders. This can sometimes translate to higher premiums and a strategy around maximising profits rather than prioritising member benefits. On the other hand, not-for-profit funds are structured in a way that lets them reinvest any surplus money back into the fund to benefit their members. They can usually offer more competitive premiums and may even provide you with extra benefits or services.
Another key difference is their governance structure. For example, while for-profit funds are governed by a board of directors whose primary objective is to maximise shareholder returns, not-for-profit health insurance funds are run by a board of trustees or members who are working towards the best interests of their policyholders.
There are a few other differences that might help you decide which type of fund to pursue. Customer service and member satisfaction will be different depending on which of the two funds you go with. Not-for-profit funds will usually concern themselves with member satisfaction and might give you an all-round more personalised service and support offering. They are usually more transparent about their operations as well.
Ultimately, the choice between a for-profit versus not-for-profit health fund will depend entirely on what you want individually. While some Aussies will be drawn to cheaper premiums and competitive benefits, others might value the community focus and member-centric approach of not-for-profit funds.
Not really.
The cost of private health insurance depends on all sorts of things, from the level of cover you want, to the breadth of their provider network, to your own individual circumstances – rather than just whether the fund is for-profit or not-for-profit.
While for-profit funds are built to make the greatest profits and deliver returns to shareholders, not-for-profit funds are more about member benefits and reinvesting surpluses. In general, that means not-for-profit funds can usually offer more competitive premiums and value-added benefits, making them potentially less expensive for policyholders. However, this isn’t always the case, as pricing can also be influenced by market competition and regulatory requirements.